Guest Post: “In Defense of Fluff and Fun” by Erin Lindsey

You may have caught our review (and GIVEAWAY too!) of The Bloodbound last week, and today we are excited to have author Erin Lindsey on board to talk discuss the novel and her approach to world-building. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did, and if you haven’t checked out our giveaway yet, there’s still time! It is an excellent book with its perfect mix of fantasy and romance, and not to be missed.

IN DEFENSE OF FLUFF AND FUN
by Erin Lindsey

Recently, I came across an article by Justin Landon on Tor.com [http://www.tor.com/blogs/2014/09/book-review-the-broken-eye-brent-weeks] that made me sit up and say Yes.

IThe Bloodboundn fact, it made me sit up and say something a little more emphatic than that, but I’m trying to keep it PG here.

The post was primarily a review of THE BROKEN EYE by Brent Weeks. The part that made me sit up and take notice, though, was this:

The frustration I have … is [the suggestion that] there’s something wrong with pulp, and that epic fantasy should necessarily have some larger agenda. … Is it enough to merely entertain? I believe this argument is at the core of a lot of criticism that surrounds epic fantasy.”

I couldn’t agree more, and in fact I’d extend the argument to SF/F in general. Somewhere along the line, it has become a virtual truism in speculative fiction that it isn’t enough merely to tell a good story. A book might be wildly entertaining, but if it isn’t tackling some Big Issue, then it falls short. At the very least, it should challenge genre tropes, subvert expectations, dazzle us with meticulous research and thought-provoking what ifs. It should be meaningful.

The thing is, I don’t buy that. In fact, I think it’s rubbish.

I admire a complex, thought-provoking tale as much as the next person. Guy Gavriel Kay’s TIGANA made me want to hang ‘em up forever, because there was just no way I could ever craft something that brilliant. The commentary on the importance of identity and control of the historical narrative… it resonated so much with me. But you know what? I’ve had just as much fun reading what Landon refers to as “charismatic fluff” – and I’m not ashamed of it. Where is written that SF/F has to be cerebral to be good?

I have a similar attitude when it comes to world-building. One of my biggest pet peeves as a reader of fantasy is gratuitous world-building – “gratuitous” being the operative word here. World-building is a necessary – and wonderful – feature of the genre. But there is a fine line between adding depth and texture and indulging in unnecessary flourishes that don’t actually enhance the story in any meaningful way. Do I really need to know the two hundred year backstory of the hero’s family estate? Is it important to the plot that the spiced mutton being served at this meal is stewed in cherries because that’s the way King Unpronouncablename decreed it must be prepared during the Reign of Terror and it’s been like that ever since? Do I need the entire theology of the world to be crammed into Book 1 of the series? I love it when these kinds of details are folded in gradually and elegantly, in ways that enhance the story. Too often, though, they’re a detour, a scenic route taken not for the reader, but for the author, just to show that s/he’s thought it through. As a writer, I certainly understand the impulse – you’ve created a three dimensional world, and you want to show it off – but as a reader, I often find it disruptive. It doesn’t enrich the story, but intrudes on it. At worst, it can come off as self-indulgent and boring.

So how much is too much? I think it comes down to taste. As with descriptive language, romance, and so many things, some like a heavier hand, some a lighter touch. Somehow, though, it seems as if elaborate world-building, like thought-provoking themes, has become a requirement for the genre, a once-size-fits-all criterion against which all contenders will be measured. I think that’s a shame.

No surprise, then, that as an author, I tend towards minimalism. With THE BLOODBOUND, I made a conscious effort to focus on characters rather than magic systems and religions and backstory. I didn’t have a Message, and the themes I’m playing with are certainly not new. As it says in my author bio, I wanted to create the perfect summer vacation novel. I wasn’t out to re-invent the wheel – just to make it the shiniest, fastest, most entertaining wheel it could be. Because for my money, those sorts of books are often the most enjoyable.

Your mileage may vary. But that’s the beauty of speculative fiction – it’s all about variety.

Or at least, it should be.

* * *

ed119-e-l-tettensorABOUT THE AUTHOR

Erin Lindsey is on a quest to write the perfect summer vacation novel, with just the right blend of action, heartbreak, and triumph. The Bloodbound is her first effort. She lives and works in Bujumbura, Burundi, with her husband a pair of half-domesticated cats.

Advertisements

9 Comments on “Guest Post: “In Defense of Fluff and Fun” by Erin Lindsey

  1. I often think that “fun” books don’t get enough credit. There is really something to be said about fun addictive reads. Just because you can’t sit back and point out major worldy themes or if it is more character driven does not mean that it was easy to write or should be given less credit. A story that is fun and keeps me entertained (and up too late at night) and invested in the characters is just as worthy of praise. 🙂

    Like

  2. Well said! I do enjoy books that contain messages, but I like my fluff just as much if not more than my smart reads. There comes a point in every day where I simply don’t want to think anymore, and need to immerse myself in a story just for its entertainment value regardless of the genre.

    Like

  3. There is nothing better after reading a really tough grimdark or gritty SF then going to a really awesome fun read, it makes the book hangover easier to deal with.

    Like

  4. I enjoyed this post and I absolutely agree, what it all comes down to is entertainment. If a book is meaningful but boring it’s a flop, but a book can just be entertaining. Some people do seem to think ‘rich world building’ means over the top details, but it’s really just putting thought in the little things.

    Like

  5. Oh my gosh yes! You scream it sister! It does NOT need to tackle all these crazy issues to be an excellent read. Sometimes sometimes I JUST WANT TO ENJOY! I just want to enjoy and not have my brain picked and and pickled by all this stuff that I need to digest and consider and wonder over. There are other moments when I want my hind brain tickled and I want to read about the issues but I can tell you more often then not after I’ve had a hard days work of mind dumbing stuff I just want some fluffy unicorns and rainbows or some smash and dash action.

    World building definitely takes a delicate touch to get right. While I love some epic fantasy now and then its probably one of the reasons why I can’t read it as often as some of my friends because it just overwhelms me with too muchy muchness.

    I can’t wait to read your book!!!

    Like

  6. Pingback: Book Review: The Bloodforged by Erin Lindsey | The BiblioSanctum

  7. Pingback: Book Review: The Bloodsworn by Erin Lindsey | The BiblioSanctum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: