Book Review: Lady Macbeth by Ava Reid
I received a review copy from the publisher. This does not affect the contents of my review and all opinions are my own.
Mogsy’s Rating: 3.5 of 5 stars
Genre: Fantasy
Series: Stand Alone
Publisher: Del Rey (August 13, 2024)
Length: 320 pages
Author Information: Website
Ironically, few things excite me more than Shakespearean inspired fantasy, even if years of boring high school lit classes have killed pretty much any enthusiasm I have for the works of the great Bard. These days I’m unlikely to pick up Shakespeare for pleasure, but pitch me a reimagining of Macbeth as told from the perspective of one of literature’s most famous villainesses and throw in dragons, curses, and sorcery for good measure, and I’m like, where do I sign up?
Enter Ava Reid’s Lady Macbeth, and now that I’ve read it, I certainly have opinions, both complimentary and critical. To provide some context though, I think it’s important to acknowledge the elements that stand out, even those aspects which are likely to frustrate readers. The book is a dark and rather loose retelling of Shakespeare’s classic play with a quasi-historical fiction bent, centering around seventeen-year-old Roscille who has been thrust into a world dominated by men and violence upon her marriage to the fearsome Scottish warrior Macbeth. But Roscille, alone and frightened as she is, has some secrets of her own. Said to possess witch powers, she makes furtive attempts at manipulation and charming others with her beauty in order to survive, but her youth and inexperience often lead her floundering in the dangerous power dynamics of her new life.
Brutal as he is, however, her husband appears to trust her, even if it does stem from his regard of her as his own property. He reveals to her his hidden dealings with the world of the occult and his beliefs in magic and prophecy, perhaps giving insight into his uncanny bravado and charisma. Despite her efforts to maintain control over her life, Roscille finds herself surrounded by adversaries in Macbeth’s court, growing increasingly isolated. But just when she hits rock bottom and feels the most desperate, an unexpected alliance and romance may emerge from the least likely of places.
Look around and you might see a lot of reluctance to call Lady Macbeth a retelling, and for good reason. Aside from the plot’s lack of faithfulness to the source material, you’re also looking at significant changes made to the key characters. But this, to me, was a positive. One of the book’s best features is the author’s ability to bring Roscille to life, even if she is a far cry from the strong, ambitious, and morally sketchy woman whom she was based on. Reid’s Lady Macbeth is her own creation, and she has written a protagonist whose trauma and subsequent resilience to those challenges have shaped her personality and motivations, which feel authentic and earned. The story also introduces new elements like magic and mythical creatures that have little to do with the original play, but as this is a fantasy novel, I’m quite happy for these changes placing it solidly into this category.
Still, there were other deviations that were less welcome. For one, we have the huge shift in focus from the main theme of the original Macbeth, which I felt was key to the play and should have been kept somewhat intact or at least present. Instead, opportunities to explore the darker side of human nature—unchecked ambition, the corrupting force of power, soul-rending guilt, etc.—were largely ignored in Lady Macbeth, and that was a little disappointing. Then there was the way the novel handled the relationship between Roscille and Macbeth. In this story, the latter holds all the power, and Reid doesn’t shy away from the harsher realities of their marriage. In her portrayal, though, Roscille is robbed of much of her agency, and the dynamics that exist between the couple in Shakespeare’s Macbeth are either diluted or flipped.
In terms of its technical aspects, the writing was rich and evocative, which enhanced the gothic vibes of the atmosphere. But unstable pacing made the first half a slow read, and in many ways, the fantasy elements were instrumental in helping things pick back up, even if they took the original plot off its rails. Such is nature of retellings or reimaginings—you have to take both the strengths and flaws that come with the author’s creative choices.
In the case of Lady Macbeth, those choices offered a fresh perspective. However, as much as I enjoyed some of Reid’s new interpretations, not all of them resonated with me the same way. In the end, I think readers will largely fall into one of two camps—those who appreciate the bolder changes, or those who would have preferred to see more of the familiar and important themes in Shakespeare’s play preserved.
![]()
![]()











At what point do changes in a “retelling” become the author ripping off familiar names and plot points for their own story? After Dune Part II, I’ve thought long and hard about this.
I don’t have a good blanket answer, even for myself. McKillip used a lot of fairytales in her stories, down to the plot points. But they were just elements in the story and never claimed to be “retellings”….
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was tempted to read this but just had too many other books on my plate. It sounds like a unique take on Macbeth, even if not everything worked.
LikeLike
Excellent review Mogsy! As I have never read the original, this Lady MacBeth wouldn’t suffer any comparison so I might give it a try!
LikeLike
Similar to Sophie, I haven’t read the original so I imagine I would be more forgiving of some of the changes in direction.
Lynn 😀
LikeLike
I have no idea where i would fall, but I do like her books
LikeLike
Shakespearean retellings can be hit or miss for me. This sounds interesting, but maybe best that I skipped it!
LikeLike
So less of a retelling and more something inspired by. I see that often with movies, where they will use the original book’s name even though there may be almost nothing in common other than the seeds of ideas that spawned something else entirely. Sounds like this one may be a little more down the middle, though, regarding the mix of old and new.
LikeLike
An excellent, nuanced review! I think the fantastical aspect of the story wouldn’t bother me – especially as Macbeth has a lot of magic, both real and metaphorical in the original play. The fact that this retelling simply side-steps most of the original themes would be more of a problem for me, though. Particularly as in the original play, Lady M clearly has a huge impact on her husband’s decisions and I’d find the depiction of a shrinking wife lacking agency hugely irritating!
LikeLike
I ended up coming away from this one feeling rather similar to you. I liked the angle that the author was going for but I don’t really think it works as a Macbeth retelling as such. I went into this expecting a scheming, manipulative female lead who falls into madness but the descent wasn’t really covered and although she did have a manipulative side it was kind of cushioned with innocence. If I’d picked it up without the Macbeth comparison I’d have loved it though I believe. I also love the authors writing and quite like the different approach to the witches. It just doesn’t feel like that Macbeth label fits and if anyone’s a major fan of Shakespeare I can see them being disappointed.
LikeLike